- Posted August 16, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Federal court rules Mich. panhandling law violates free speech
GRAND RAPIDS (AP) -- A federal appeals court has ruled unconstitutional a state law banning panhandling in public places.
The Sixth U.S. Circuit court on Wednesday agreed with a lower court's opinion last year that the law violates First Amendment protections for free speech. The case stems from the arrest of two Grand Rapids men arrested in 2011 for begging.
The appellate opinion says the law "would chill a substantial amount of First Amendment-protected activity." It added that Michigan's interest in preventing fraud can be better served by a more narrowly tailored statute.
James Speet and Ernest Sims were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, which called the ruling a "victory for free speech."
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette's spokeswoman Joy Yearout says the ruling is under review.
Published: Fri, Aug 16, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Bench/Bar Conference
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to support the education and safety of Michigan Children, other legislation
- Attorney general decries latest DTE electric rate hike request
- Federal judges approve redraw of Detroit-area state House seats ahead of 2024 election
- Local moot court team impresses at ABA National Advocacy Competition
headlines National
- 50 Years of Service: ABA has been a ‘stalwart ally’ for LSC funding
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Biden recalls time he bluffed knowledge of torts case and why he changed his mind about civil-trial work
- Lawyers’ ‘barrage of personal attacks’ on opponents started with tissue-box toss, appeals court says
- Longtime prosecutor resigns after judge tosses him from case, citing Perry Mason-type revelations
- 24% of law students expect to work in public service, survey says