- Posted October 20, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lawmakers urge probe of Justice Thomas' income nondisclosures
The Daily Record Newswire
In a letter to the U.S. Judicial Conference, 19 House lawmakers called for an investigation into whether U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas violated federal ethics laws by omitting information from annual financial disclosure forms.
The members of Congress cite disclosure forms submitted by Thomas in past years with the box titled "none" checked in relation to his wife's income.
Thomas later amended the disclosures to include $686,000 in income that his wife Virginia Thomas earned from the Heritage Foundation, calling the initial omission an oversight.
The lawmakers requested that the matter be referred to the Justice Department to determine if the nondisclosure violated the Ethics in Government Act.
The law requires the Conference to refer to the Justice Department any judge it "has reasonable cause to believe has willfully failed to file a report or has willfully falsified or willfully failed to file information required to be reported."
Under the Act, the maximum penalty for failure to properly fill out the disclosure forms is $10,000.
"To believe that Justice Thomas didn't know how to fill out a basic disclosure form is absurd," Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., ranking Member of the House Rules Committee and one of the letter's signatories.
"It is reasonable, in every sense of the word, to believe that a member of the highest court in the land should know how to properly disclose almost $700,000 worth of income.
"To not be able to do so is suspicious, and according to law, requires further investigation."
Published: Thu, Oct 20, 2011
headlines Washtenaw County
- Law firm donates legal fees to ACLU of Michigan
- Foster Swift selects Taylor A. Gast as Business & Tax Practice co-leader
- MLaw Civil-Criminal Litigation Clinic partners on suit against online “ghost gun” seller
- Student in the Dual JD Program explores criminal defense work
- ABA Free Legal Answers announces 2023 leaders lending pro bono support
headlines National
- 50 Years of Service: ABA has been a ‘stalwart ally’ for LSC funding
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Biden recalls time he bluffed knowledge of torts case and why he changed his mind about civil-trial work
- Lawyers’ ‘barrage of personal attacks’ on opponents started with tissue-box toss, appeals court says
- Longtime prosecutor resigns after judge tosses him from case, citing Perry Mason-type revelations
- 24% of law students expect to work in public service, survey says