- Posted February 16, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Bills to cut state judgeships pass House; now head to governor for signing
State legislators who passed bills to cut unneeded state judgeships were praised by Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr., as the last of the bills passed the House Tuesday.
Approved by the Senate last week, the bills now head to Governor Rick Snyder for his signature.
"The legislators are doing the right thing for the courts and for the taxpayers," said Young. "In politics, it's easy to grow the size of government, but it takes political courage to reduce it. These legislators showed their courage and their common sense."
The Senate and House both overwhelmingly passed House Bills 5071-75, 5093-95, 5101-04, and 5106-07. If signed by Snyder, the bills, together with legislation already signed by Snyder, would cut 36 state trial court judgeships by attrition.
"This is the largest cut in judgeships ever accomplished in the United States - it is unprecedented," Young said.
When complete, the cuts will save the state approximately $6 million per year. The state will save about $750,000 by the end of 2012 from five open judicial seats that will be eliminated by the legislation.
The bills are based on the Judicial Resources Recommendations, a 2011 report issued by the State Court Administrative Office, the administrative agency of the Michigan Supreme Court. The report called for cutting 45 trial court judgeships in courts where the workload could be handled by fewer judges.
Young noted that SCAO has recommended cutting judgeships for many years. "But past
Legislatures weren't inclined to act," he said. "The Senate and the House have taken a much-needed step by cutting judgeships that are no longer justified by the workload. This right-sizing of our judiciary is the front edge of reforms we need to make for a more service-oriented and efficient court system."
Young said that the Supreme Court unanimously supported the 2011 Judicial Resources
Recommendations and that the Michigan Court of Appeals, the Michigan Judges Association, the Michigan Probate Judges Association, and the Michigan District Judges Association also endorsed the findings. He also credited the State Bar of Michigan for calling for setting the number of judgeships based on workload.
SCAO, the Supreme Court's administrative agency, issues a Judicial Resources
Recommendations report every two years. For more information on the 2011 report, go to http:/www.courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt/Press/2011JRR.html.
Published: Thu, Feb 16, 2012
headlines Washtenaw County
- Report recommends ways courts can increase juror response and participation
- 5Qs: University of Michigan Law Professor Barbara McQuade discusses how to fight disinformation and save democracy
- Childhood passion for nature leads to Detroit student’s interest in environmental law
- ACLU of Michigan announces appointment of new political director
- Council stays the course on JD-Next admissions exam
headlines National
- 50 Years of Service: ABA has been a ‘stalwart ally’ for LSC funding
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Biden recalls time he bluffed knowledge of torts case and why he changed his mind about civil-trial work
- Lawyers’ ‘barrage of personal attacks’ on opponents started with tissue-box toss, appeals court says
- Longtime prosecutor resigns after judge tosses him from case, citing Perry Mason-type revelations
- 24% of law students expect to work in public service, survey says