Archives
January 19, 2018
Feature
- Clinic Christened
- Mock trial and moot court affirmed WSU student's passion for advocacy
- Lund takes the reins of Court Historical Society
- Daily Briefs
- The Tech Revolution in Law
Column
- Sunday's 'Chill' to serve as a first step to better 'Way'
- What good financial advice looks like
- Re-criminalizing cannabis is worse than 1930s 'reefer madness'
- School choice breaks down racial barriers
- Why well-drafted contracts matter: a litigator's perspective
Business
- Entire operation of federal consumer regulator under review
- Consumer watchdog considering repeal of payday lending rule
- Edmunds: Before buying used car, consider luxury alternative
- Re-criminalizing cannabis is worse than 1930s 'reefer madness'
- What good financial advice looks like
- California Parents of killed college student not focused on motive
Courts
- A blow to the contingent fee?
- Neo-Nazi publisher won?t reveal whereabouts, citing threats
- Parents of killed college student not focused on motive
- ACLU campaign to present 3 animated short films on mass incarceration at Sundance Film Festival
Nation
- Women overcome community pressure to send man to prison
- Sheriffs, immigration officials unveil plan to work together
- National Roundup
State
headlines Detroit
- Zearfoss to deliver Michigan Law commencement address ahead of planned retirement
- War with Iran fails to produce a ‘win’ that U.S and Israel were blindly seeking
- From conferences to certificates, MSU’s Indigenous Law and Policy Center leads the future of Tribal Law
- Business Law Seminar featuring 10 judges slated May 7 in Troy
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill
