Archives
September 23, 2021
Feature
- Michigan Supreme Court announces October oral arguments
- A Fresh Look at Med-Arb for Business Disputes
- Report: One in 11 imprisoned Black women in Michigan is serving life without parole
- Daily Briefs
- How the Satanic Temple is using 'abortion rituals' to claim religious liberty against the Texas 'heartbeat bill'
Business
- China, U.S. unveil separate big steps to fight climate change
- Apple, Google raise new concerns by yanking Russian app
- Existing U.S. home sales fell in August, price growth slowed
Column
- Countering regret-aversion bias
- Spreading HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is against the law in 37 states
Courts
- Trump sues niece, NY Times over records behind '18 tax story
- Airman on trial in death of young Mennonite woman
- Court Digest
- Justice Department sues to block unprecedented domestic alliance between American Airlines and JetBlue
- ABA files brief with Supreme Court in support of states' right to limit concealed weapon permits
Nation
- Officials: Many migrants from border camp staying in U.S.
- Gun, badge, app: NYPD uses tech to tackle community concerns
- Sentencing set for former DA convicted of felonies
- National Roundup
- State voting rights case argued at U.S. appeals court
State
headlines Detroit
- Zearfoss to deliver Michigan Law commencement address ahead of planned retirement
- War with Iran fails to produce a ‘win’ that U.S and Israel were blindly seeking
- From conferences to certificates, MSU’s Indigenous Law and Policy Center leads the future of Tribal Law
- Business Law Seminar featuring 10 judges slated May 7 in Troy
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill
