Archives
February 13, 2024
Feature
- SAGE Award recognizes law professor’s work at intersection of law and psychology
- Special counsel inserts himself unnecessarily in 2024 campaign
- A Brief History of Dearborn — The First Arab-American Majority City in the U.S.
- ABA asks Supreme Court to reverse second-guessing of FDA
- Daily Briefs
Business
- Less is more? Consumers have fewer choices as brands prune their offerings to focus on best sellers
- Recession risks are fading, business economists say, but political tensions pose threat to economy
- How to get the most money for your trade-in vehicle
Column
Courts
- Two fired FirstEnergy executives indicted in $60 million bribery scheme, fail to surrender
- Father in gender-reveal that sparked fatal 2020 wildfire pleads guilty
- AI ‘companions’ promise to combat loneliness, but history shows the dangers of one-way relationships
- In possible test of federal labor law, state could make it harder for some workers to join unions
Nation
- Post-Roe v. Wade, more patients rely on early prenatal testing as states toughen abortion laws
- Biden’s legal team went to Justice Dept. over what they viewed as unnecessary digs at his memory
- National Roundup
- How Trump urging Russia to invade ‘delinquent’ NATO members distorts how the alliance works
State
headlines Detroit
- Michigan Law student receives Institute for Policy Integrity fellowship to work on environmental and energy policy
- DOJ suing Washtenaw County over immigration enforcement
- MPA sounds alarm bells on ongoing threats to transparency
- After court decision, MSP seeking applications for FEMA grant program
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill
