The American Bar Association filed an amicus brief Monday with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the court in a closely watched redistricting case to affirm a federal district court’s ruling that Alabama’s 2021 congressional redistricting plan violated Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act.
Alabama argues that its plan, which created one minority-majority district out of seven, is race neutral based on computer modeling. The state further asks the Supreme Court to upend precedent allowing the consideration of race when conducting the analysis of Section 2 claims established in the Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Thornburg v. Gingles.
Following the 2020 census, Alabama adopted a plan for its seven congressional districts that contained only one majority-Black district despite the Black voting-age population of 25.9%. A federal district court applied Gingles to hold that Alabama violated Section 2 because it would be possible to create a second majority-Black district. In February, the high court by a 5-4 vote stayed the lower court’s decision and ordered full briefing and oral argument for its next term.
In its brief, the ABA said racial discrimination “still exists in the electoral process” and that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act has served as a “key means of ensuring that all Americans have an equal opportunity to exercise the fundamental right to vote.” The ABA also asked the Supreme Court to “reaffirm its longstanding interpretation” of Section 2.
“The Gingles interpretation has been settled law for 36 years without congressional revision,” the ABA brief said. “And throughout multiple redistricting cycles, litigants and governments have relied on Gingles as the test to balance governments’ redistricting prerogatives and minorities voting rights.”
The ABA added that Section 2 is consistent with the 14th and 15th Amendments, which are both post-Civil War, equal rights provisions.
The law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP filed the brief pro bono on behalf of the ABA.
- Posted July 20, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
ABA asks U.S. Supreme Court to hold Alabama redistricting plan violates the Voting Rights Act
headlines Oakland County
- Annual Dinner & Meeting
- FORCE Team arrests six in prolific auto theft ring
- Michigan allocates $12 million to support community-based organizations in advancing environmental and climate justice
- Oakland County and SMART launch pilot program providing free transit for veterans and dependents
- Supreme Court sides with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
headlines National
- More lawyers—and clients—want to learn about sustainable development practices
- Top artificial intelligence insurance tips for lawyers
- Lawyer charged with illegally transmitting Michigan data after 2020 election
- Viral video shows former Rikers Island inmate as she learns she passed bar exam on first try
- How Sullivan & Cromwell is scrutinizing potential new hires after campus protests
- No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes, SCOTUS rules