––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://www.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted September 11, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Letter sent to Vice President Biden in support of chief judges' funding request for federal court
DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar and its Center for Law and Public Policy have endorsed a letter sent to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. last month by the chief judges of 87 federal district courts. In that letter, the judges petitioned the Vice President in his role as president of the Senate to support sufficient funding levels for federal courts that would relieve them of the crisis in which they have been placed by past funding cuts and the effects of sequestration.
Those effected cited by the judges include loss and furloughing of staff, threats to security at courthouses, public endangerment in the reduction of probation and pre-trial services officers, and severe staff shortages that have resulted in "slower processing of civil and bankruptcy cases which impacts individuals and businesses seeking to resolve disputes in the federal courts." They declared that, "further cuts would directly affect our ability to carry out our constitutional and statutory duties."
In its own letter to the Vice President, DRI, representing 22,000 defense attorneys of the civil justice system, emphasized the growing crisis in the civil courts. DRI president Mary Massaron Ross, of Plunkett Cooney, and Marc Williams, chair of DRI's Center for Law and Public Policy said, "For civil cases, which must yield precedence to criminal ones, the reductions can easily mean hardship for the litigants and an enormous increase in the costs associated with pursuing one's day in court."
The cuts are forcing the courts to decide who is provided justice and who is denied it through unreasonable delay; which essential section of the judicial structure is considered non-essential for budget purposes; which courts get physical protection and which do not; and which businesses will fail for lack of access to justice.
The DRI letter declared that, "a more permanent solution must be found through a consensus of the three branches. Justice should not be held hostage to the political and budgetary battles between the other two branches." Massaron Ross and Williams pledged DRI's support "for a more permanent and inviolable source of funding for the only branch of government charged by the Constitution to provide justice for the American people."
Published: Wed, Sep 11, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Associations gather for Spring Fling
- Nessel announces airline passenger protection partnership with U.S. Department of Transportation
- American Bar Association to release Civic Literacy Survey 2024 findings on April 23
- Former State House speaker charged with 13 felonies, conducting a criminal enterprise
- SUPREME COURT NOTEBOOK
headlines National
- Incarceration series includes female inmates but doesn’t tell full story
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former DOJ official who alleged election fraud violated at least one ethics rule, ethics committee says
- Winston & Strawn will provide reduced-cost legal services for routine tasks under Winston Legal Solutions umbrella
- Should Justice Sotomayor retire? Chemerinsky, White House haven’t joined calls for her to step down
- Which BigLaw firms are increasing lateral associate hiring the most? One made legal headlines last year