GRAND RAPIDS (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court is giving new life to a lawsuit that challenged Grand Rapids police officers who took photographs and fingerprints of people who lacked identification.
The case is returning to the state appeals court to determine if the photos and prints violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches.
Lawsuits were filed on behalf of two young black males who were stopped by police. Their photos and prints were taken, although they weren’t charged with crimes.
The Supreme Court said Monday that a city can be liable for authorizing certain conduct, even if the city doesn’t specifically tell employees to do it.
The lawsuits against Grand Rapids were filed before a policy change in 2015. Police said fingerprints would be taken from people without ID only if their behavior was “highly suspicious.”
- Posted August 1, 2018
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State Supreme Court revives lawsuit over police fingerprint policy
headlines Oakland County
- Elite company: Attorney ranks among best in a variety of pursuits
- Supreme Court announces commission charged with closing the justice gap, improving court access for all Michiganians
- Elder Abuse Task Force announces new online trainings on the signs of abuse, neglect, and exploitation
- WMU-Cooley holds commencement for its fall term graduates
- Sheriff PAL Program pivots and partners during pandemic to raise funds for local youth
headlines National
- Judge sanctions lawyer and client $150K, citing ‘mountain of evasiveness’ and ‘outright lies’
- Mayor of Portland, Oregon, pepper-sprays lawyer in parking lot
- New Impeachment, Same Lawyers: House Judiciary Rehires Barry Berke & Joshua Matz for Trump's 2nd Trial
- Lawyer at Capitol Riots Is Arrested
- The Supreme Court’s role in defining American citizenship