- Posted May 03, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Nebraska Justice Dept.: Dismiss suit over contraception
By Grant Schulte
Associated Press
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- The U.S. Justice Department is asking a judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by several states that challenges a new federal health care rule that requires contraception coverage for employees of church-affiliated hospitals, schools and outreach programs.
Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, who is leading the suit, scoffed at the request Tuesday, noting that the department has pushed the rule's enforcement deadline to next year -- after the November elections -- and hasn't detailed how it plans in the meantime to address religious groups' concerns.
"Regardless of the continuous promises of change offered by this administration, the results are nothing more than bait and switch," the Republican, who is running for U.S. Senate, said.
Department lawyers argued for the lawsuit's dismissal in court papers filed late Monday, noting that they have agreed not to enforce the rule until August 2013 and have promised to work with religious groups.
The lawsuit alleges that the new rule violates the First Amendment rights of groups that object to the use of contraceptives.
It was filed in U.S. District Court of Nebraska by Bruning and his fellow GOP attorneys general from Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas. Three Nebraska-based groups -- Catholic Social Services, Pius X Catholic High School and the Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America -- are also plaintiffs, as are a nun and a female missionary.
The rule was announced as part of the federal health care law -- and came under fire in February from religious groups that object to the use of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. In response to the criticism, President Barack Obama's administration has said it would shift the requirement from the employers to health insurers themselves.
The lawsuit alleges that the rule will effectively force religious employers and organizations to drop health insurance coverage, which will raise enrollment in state Medicaid programs and increase patient numbers at state-subsidized hospitals and medical centers. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is named as a defendant.
In court papers, Justice Department lawyers said the groups have failed to show that they face the immediate threat of having to offer the coverage. They said delaying the enforcement provides a "safe harbor" for concerned religious groups while the rules are being changed, and the department will grandfather in many existing coverage plans.
Published: Thu, May 3, 2012
headlines Detroit
- Cooley Law School Expungement Fair helps 88 individuals
- Enbridge argues alternative versus status quo in MSC oral arguments against PSC permits for Line 5 tunnel project
- Cooley Law School student eyes career in personal injury sector
- Daily Briefs
- Three takeaways from faculty panel on local and national immigration enforcement
headlines National
- Online shoppers find deals on the Temu app, but states say the trade-off is personal data
- Florida Bar reverses itself, says it is not investigating Lindsey Halligan
- Attorney indicted for trying to kill her husband of more than 25 years
- American Bar Association cites members’ needs in law firm intimidation hearing
- OpenAI sued for practicing law without a license
- Lindsey Halligan being investigated by the Florida Bar




