Bills cutting judgeships go to governor

State lawmakers who approved bills to cut state judgeships came in for praise from state Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr., as the last of the measures passed the House on Tuesday.
 Approved by the Senate last week, the bills now head to Gov. Rick Snyder for his signature.

“The legislators are doing the right thing for the courts and for the taxpayers,” said Young. “In politics, it’s easy to grow the size of government, but it takes political courage to reduce it. These legislators showed their courage and their common sense.”

If signed by Snyder, the bills, together with legislation already signed by the govdernor, would cut 36 state trial court judgeships by attrition.

“This is the largest cut in judgeships ever accomplished in the United States – it is unprecedented,” Young said.

 When complete, the cuts will save the state approximately $6 million per year. The state will save about $750,000 by the end of 2012 from five open judicial seats that will be eliminated by the legislation.
The bills are based on a 2011 report issued by the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), the administrative agency of the Michigan Supreme Court.

The report called for cutting 45 trial court judgeships in courts where the workload could be handled by fewer judges.

Young noted that SCAO has recommended cutting judgeships for many years.

“But past Legislatures weren’t inclined to act,” he said. “The Senate and the House have taken a much-needed step by cutting judgeships that are no longer justified by the workload. This right-sizing of our judiciary is the front edge of reforms we need to make for a more service-oriented and efficient court system.”

 Young said that the Supreme Court unanimously supported the 2011 Judicial Resources Recommendations and that the Michigan Court of Appeals, the Michigan Judges Association, the Michigan Probate Judges Association, and the Michigan District Judges Association also endorsed the findings.

He also credited the State Bar of Michigan for calling for setting the number of judgeships based on workload.


  1. No comments
Sign in to post a comment »