WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from North Carolina to revive a requirement that abortion providers show and describe an ultrasound to a pregnant woman before she has an abortion.
The justices left in place an appeals court decision that said the 2011 North Carolina law was “ideological in intent” and violated doctors’ free-speech rights.
The North Carolina law would have required abortion providers to display and describe the ultrasound even if the woman refused to look and listen — a mandate that the court found particularly troublesome.
North Carolina is among 23 states, mostly in the South and the Midwest, which passed laws dealing with the administration of ultrasounds by abortion providers, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research institute that supports abortion-rights.
Justice Antonin Scalia voted to hear the appeal.
The court took no action in a separate abortion case from Mississippi. The state is appealing a lower court ruling that effectively allowed Mississippi’s lone abortion clinic to remain open and blocked a state law that would have required the clinic’s doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.
A second appeals court ruling involving a Texas law imposing restrictions on abortion providers also is expected to make its way to the Supreme Court soon.
- Posted June 17, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court won't revive state abortion law
headlines Macomb
- ABA 2026 White Collar Crime Institute to convene March 10-13 in San Diego
- Scholarships encourage future advocates in elder, special needs law
- Wrongful detention of Americans, hostage diplomacy to top ABA national security luncheon on March 5
- Special insight: Tax attorney relishes opportunity to help people
- Gov. Whitmer Proclaims March 2026 as March is Reading Month
headlines National
- Judge orders SCOTUSblog founder Goldstein to home confinement until sentencing
- Plaintiff testifies about addiction in trial against social media companies
- EEOC reverses course on transgender workers’ right to choose restrooms
- Amazon sues review-selling websites, alleging fake online reviews
- Police identify employee at assisted living facility in murder of philanthropist attorney
- New directory of private lending options created as student loan regulations shift




