WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won’t consider reinstating the conviction of a Michigan man charged with a 1988 murder in a drug dispute.
The justices rejected Michigan’s appeal of a federal court ruling that overturned the conviction of Junior Fred Blackston.
A federal district judge ruled in 2013 that Blackston was denied a fair trial in state court because he wasn’t allowed to attack the credibility of two key witnesses who recanted their testimony between his first and second trials. The earlier testimony was read to jurors during the second trial.
A federal appeals court agreed that Blackston had a right to challenge the earlier testimony with written statements from the witnesses saying it was wrong.
Justice Antonin Scalia issued a written dissent, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, saying the high court should have taken up the case.
- Posted December 03, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court won't review Michigan case
headlines Macomb
- ABA 2026 White Collar Crime Institute to convene March 10-13 in San Diego
- Scholarships encourage future advocates in elder, special needs law
- Wrongful detention of Americans, hostage diplomacy to top ABA national security luncheon on March 5
- Special insight: Tax attorney relishes opportunity to help people
- Gov. Whitmer Proclaims March 2026 as March is Reading Month
headlines National
- Judge orders SCOTUSblog founder Goldstein to home confinement until sentencing
- Plaintiff testifies about addiction in trial against social media companies
- EEOC reverses course on transgender workers’ right to choose restrooms
- Amazon sues review-selling websites, alleging fake online reviews
- Police identify employee at assisted living facility in murder of philanthropist attorney
- New directory of private lending options created as student loan regulations shift
