WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won’t hear appeals from tobacco companies that wanted to reduce payments owed to Maryland and Pennsylvania.
After a federal arbitration panel in 2013 cut the annual payments by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA, and others, state courts ruled that was wrong.
The justices are leaving those rulings in place. The payments reimburse the states for smoking-related health costs.
A nationwide settlement in 1998 allowed tobacco companies to seek a reduction if they lost market share to competitors not participating in the agreement.
States could avoid the reduction if they diligently enforced laws against non-participating companies.
- Posted October 19, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Appeal from tobacco firms rejected
headlines Macomb
- ‘Bridging the Gap’
- Right to Life sues over abortion protections
- Hospital to pay $30,000 in EEOC disability discrimination lawsuit
- Supreme Court rules the Postal Service can't be sued, even when mail is intentionally not delivered
- Justice Dept. and Federal Trade Commission seek public comment for guidance on business collaborations
headlines National
- A wave of lawsuits has resulted from online comments after Charlie Kirk’s assassination
- Goldman Sachs top lawyer resigns after emails show Jeffrey Epstein friendship
- Failed indictment of 6 Democratic lawmakers blamed on Jeanine Pirro-picked prosecutors
- Federal judges may address ‘illegitimate forms of criticism and attacks,’ according to new ethics opinion
- Senate GOP aims to reveal companies funding lawsuits
- Bad Bunny’s ‘love conquering hate’ message at Super Bowl reiterated by judge sentencing assaulter
