NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Advocates for an endangered species of frog have won a victory in a case that’s headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.
A federal appeals court in New Orleans has refused to revive an environmental case involving the dusky gopher frog.
Last year, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Louisiana business’s attempt to keep the federal government from listing its timberland as essential for the frog’s future.
Earlier this week, the full court voted 8-6 against re-hearing the case.
The frogs now live in some parts of Mississippi but once were found in Alabama and Louisiana as well. Environmentalists say the Louisiana land in question contains a type of pond essential to the species’ survival.
The case next goes to the Supreme Court.
The majority offered no comment Monday. Judge Edith Jones wrote a strongly worded 30-page dissent on behalf of the six-member minority.
Among her arguments: the habitat in question contains one, but not all, of the features deemed necessary for the dusky gopher frog’s survival.
Jones said the appeals court’s majority applied federal law incorrectly and the landowner should not be prohibited from developing land where the frog cannot “naturally live and grow.”
- Posted February 16, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court won't re-hear dispute over dusky gopher frog
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- Incarceration series includes female inmates but doesn’t tell full story
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former DOJ official who alleged election fraud violated at least one ethics rule, ethics committee says
- Winston & Strawn will provide reduced-cost legal services for routine tasks under Winston Legal Solutions umbrella
- Should Justice Sotomayor retire? Chemerinsky, White House haven’t joined calls for her to step down
- Which BigLaw firms are increasing lateral associate hiring the most? One made legal headlines last year