––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 20, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lawyer ordered to pay $4.5 million to U of M student
By Jeff Karoub
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) -- A jury last Thursday awarded a gay University of Michigan student body president $4.5 million in his lawsuit against a former Michigan assistant attorney general who posted about him in an anti-gay blog.
The U.S. District Court jury ruled in favor of Christopher Armstrong, who claimed he suffered distress after a blog created by Andrew Shirvell accused him of enticing minors with alcohol and recruiting people to become homosexual.
"I'm just incredibly humbled by what happened today," Armstrong told The Associated Press. "This is truly a victory -- not just for myself, but for a lot of other kids out there."
Shirvell, who was representing himself, said the jury award was "grossly excessive" for what was "clearly protected speech ... and activity."
"This should have been thrown out," he said, adding that he plans to appeal. "Juries give short shrift to First Amendment rights."
Armstrong accused Shirvell of defamation as well as emotional distress for his actions on the blog, in Facebook posts and during visits to the Ann Arbor campus.
Then-Attorney General Mike Cox fired Shirvell in 2010 after he criticized Armstrong, who graduated last year.
Shirvell has said he viewed his blog "as a movement to get" Armstrong to resign. Shirvell argued he was acting within his First Amendment rights and that his statements were either true or protected because of Armstrong's role as a public figure.
Armstrong's attorney, Deborah Gordon, had said she would drop the lawsuit if Shirvell apologized and retracted his comments. Shirvell said that was disingenuous, since it wasn't until closing arguments that a multimillion-dollar award was brought up.
Shirvell said he's unemployed and "there's no way I could possibly ever pay such a judgment."
Gordon said the jury couldn't make him apologize, so the money was the only answer.
"We needed him to retract the flat-out fabrications he had come up with about Chris," she said. "Once he refused to take responsibility, we put it in the hands of the jury."
Published: Mon, Aug 20, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Probate perspectives
- Chief Justice Cavanagh emphasizes funding need for case management system, problem-solving court expansion
- Nessel issues new consumer alert on toll or ticket scams
- Man charged with conducting large-scale gift card fraud scheme
- Supreme Court revives suit challenging restrictions on demonstrations
headlines National
- Did They Know the Score? Amid March Madness, questions remain about college athletes indicted in fixing scheme
- Google’s AI platform incited man’s death by suicide and ‘mass casualty’ attempt, suit alleges
- Goldman Sachs’ top lawyer, who has been linked to Epstein, exits with $25M pay package
- 2 lawyers convicted in staged truck accidents scheme
- Elon Musk defrauded Twitter investors in $44B buyout, jury finds
- Federal judges speak out about threats becoming ‘ordinary’




