- Posted June 20, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Convict wins dispute over financing courthouse
LANSING (AP) - The Michigan Supreme Court says criminal defendants can't be billed for the costs of running the local courthouse.
The court unanimously ruled Wednesday in favor of an Allegan County convict who challenged a $1,000 penalty that accompanied his guilty plea in a drug case. The amount included $500 as his share of the court's operating costs.
The Supreme Court says judges can't order costs that aren't authorized by the Legislature. It overturned an appeals court decision that had upheld the practice used by Allegan and other counties.
Fred Cunningham's attorney is Anne Yantus, and she says the new ruling should greatly reduce the financial burdens on convicts who often have no ability to pay.
The Allegan County court collected $195,000 in 2013.
Published: Fri, Jun 20, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Associations gather for Spring Fling
- Supreme Court denies rehearing request by attorneys sanctioned for meritless election lawsuit
- Law school conducts ‘Know Your Rights Day’ for high school students
- Oakland County household hazardous waste dropoff events promote environmental stewardship and safeguard communities
- Nessel testifies in support of BRITE Act
headlines National
- Incarceration series includes female inmates but doesn’t tell full story
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former DOJ official who alleged election fraud violated at least one ethics rule, ethics committee says
- Winston & Strawn will provide reduced-cost legal services for routine tasks under Winston Legal Solutions umbrella
- Should Justice Sotomayor retire? Chemerinsky, White House haven’t joined calls for her to step down
- Which BigLaw firms are increasing lateral associate hiring the most? One made legal headlines last year