- Posted August 05, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Federal magistrate says Detroit destroyed potential evidence in Tamara Greene case
DETROIT (AP) -- The City of Detroit destroyed potential email evidence that was ordered preserved in a lawsuit filed by the family of an exotic dancer whose killing is unsolved, a federal magistrate said.
U.S. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued the findings Wednesday related to the lawsuit from Tamara Greene's family. Whalen said if the case goes to trial a jury should be told the city "intentionally, willfully and recklessly" destroyed potential evidence.
An email seeking comment was sent Thursday by The Associated Press to city attorney John Schapka.
Whalen also recommended that another judge overseeing the case order the city and John Johnson, the city's former Law Department director, to reimburse Norman Yatooma, the Greene family's lawyer, for fees related to the court dispute about the missing email.
Johnson described Whalen's findings as "outrageous" and said the magistrate "contorted facts to substantiate his conclusions."
"He makes several leaps to get where he wants," Johnson told the Detroit Free Press.
Yatooma called Whalen's findings "the single most significant occurrence in this case to date."
"This ruling is epic," he told The Detroit News.
Whalen said there is no doubt that the city allowed email to be purged even after the suit was filed in 2005 and after an evidence preservation order was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Gerald Rosen in 2008. Whalen, however, also questioned the potential value of the email to the case.
The civil suit claims city and police officials stymied an investigation into the 2003 shooting death of Greene, 27. She was rumored to have performed at a never-proven 2002 party at the city's mayoral mansion at the time Kwame Kilpatrick was Detroit's mayor.
The city and Kilpatrick have denied the claims.
Published: Fri, Aug 5, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




