- Posted November 30, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court will decide question on crack sentencing
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court will decide whether a law meant to reduce the disparity between crack and powder cocaine prison sentences can apply those who were convicted -- but not sentenced -- before its enactment.
The high court recently agreed to hear an appeal from Edward Dorsey and Corey Hill, who were both convicted of crack cocaine crimes.
However, the men were not sentenced until after The Fair Sentencing Act went into effect. That law reduces the difference between sentences for crimes committed by crack cocaine and powder cocaine users.
The two men argue that because their sentences came after the law's effective date, they should get its lesser prison time. The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, and the high court will review that decision.
Published: Wed, Nov 30, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- Leadership role
- No legionella detected at the Oakland County jail, courthouse tower and child development center
- Jury convicts man of killing his girlfriend, the mother of his child
- Nessel files motion to reopen ‘Conditional Approval’ of DTE data center contracts
- Distinguished constitutional law scholar honored at ABA reception for lifetime achievement
headlines National
- Inter American University of Puerto Rico School of Law back in compliance with ABA standard
- Chemerinsky: The Fourth Amendment comes back to the Supreme Court
- Reinstatement of retired judge reversed by state supreme court
- Mass tort lawyer suspended for 3 years for lying to clients
- Law firms in Minneapolis are helping lawyers, staff navigate unrest
- Federal judge faces trial on charges of being ‘super drunk’ while driving




