- Posted December 22, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Defense in anti-government militia case oppose anonymous jury
By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) -- Lawyers for eight people accused of being part of anti-government militia are opposing the use of an anonymous jury at an upcoming trial in Detroit.
The court file shows nothing official from U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts. But in a filing Monday, defense attorney Richard Helfrick quotes her as saying in an email that "jurors will enjoy anonymity."
Trial is set for Feb. 7 for eight people accused of belonging to a southern Michigan militia called Hutaree. The government claims they were scheming to kill a police officer, then attack the funeral. The defense says they're guilty of nothing but meaningless bluster.
"The decision to empanel an anonymous jury is a drastic measure, which should be undertaken only in limited and carefully delineated circumstances," Helfrick said. "An anonymous jury raises the specter that the defendant is a dangerous person from whom the jurors must be protected, thereby implicating the defendant's constitutional right to a presumption of innocence."
Roberts' office had no comment when reached by The Associated Press.
It's unclear just what an anonymous jury would mean in practical terms. Helfrick suggested it could prevent defense lawyers from learning the backgrounds of potential jurors, information that could be vital to deciding whether to eliminate them from the pool.
"There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that any of the defendants have previously attempted to interfere with the judicial process or that they are likely to do so in connection with this trial," he wrote.
Potential jurors will fill out questionnaires Jan. 18.
Published: Thu, Dec 22, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- District court discourse
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




