- Posted April 19, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Trial likely in lawsuit against anti-gay ex-official
ANN ARBOR (AP) -- A federal judge has declined to dismiss a lawsuit that accuses a then-Michigan assistant attorney general of stalking a gay student government president at the University of Michigan.
Judge Arthur Tarnow's decision means the case against Andrew Shirvell will go to a jury trial, said Deborah Gordon, lawyer for ex-Michigan student leader Christopher Armstrong. The judge also dismissed Shirvell's countersuit against Armstrong.
Then-Attorney General Mike Cox fired Shirvell in 2010 after the aide criticized Armstrong on an anti-gay blog, in Facebook posts and during visits to the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
The suit accuses Shirvell of defaming Armstrong and causing him emotional distress. Tarnow issued his ruling Monday after hearing arguments from lawyers in the case, Gordon said.
"I am disappointed that Judge Tarnow threw out my counter-suit against Chris Armstrong," Shirvell said in an email message to The Associated Press on Tuesday. "I disagree with the ruling and I will appeal it at the appropriate time."
Shirvell said he was acting within his First Amendment rights in criticizing Armstrong and that his statements were either true or protected because of Armstrong's role as a public figure.
"We live in the United States. If I believe that Chris Armstrong is a radical homosexual activist, I have a constitutional right to express that opinion," Shirvell said. "I look forward to presenting my case before a jury of my peers."
Published: Thu, Apr 19, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- New ABA/Krill Strategies lawyer mental health study shows escalating burnout, risky alcohol use
- Nessel challenges administration’s rollbacks of Endangered Species Act regulations
- Time to renew license for 2026-2027 bar year
- Judge sentences man to 22 to 37 years for murder, felony firearm
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




