––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted June 25, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Students to hold mock State Supreme Court session
A real-life case about 911 operators and governmental immunity will be the focus of a mock Michigan Supreme Court session enacted by high school students at the Michigan Hall of Justice this week.
The 20 students will play the roles of Supreme Court justices and attorneys in studying the case of Patterson v Nichols and Sutton. Like actual Michigan Supreme Court hearings, the mock Supreme Court session will take place in the Supreme Court's courtroom on the 6th floor of the Hall of Justice. The Friday, June 29, event, which starts at 11 a.m., is open to the public.
Learning Center Coordinator Rachael Drenovsky said she chose a real case to help students appreciate "how real-life problems and events present legal issues. We don't often appreciate just how important a role the law has in our lives."
In Patterson v Nichols and Sutton, a five-year-old boy called 911 twice, telling both operators that his mother had passed out. The first operator told the boy that she would send police, but did not, recording the call as a prank; the second operator scolded the boy for "playing on the phone," but did send a police officer. The boy's mother, who had suffered a heart attack, died; she might have survived had medical help been sent after the first call.
The woman's daughter sued the 911 operators, alleging wrongful death and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The operators moved to dismiss these claims, invoking governmental immunity, but the trial court denied their motions and the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. The appellate court said that the case should go to trial, observing that the operators were grossly negligent and that a reasonable jury could find that the two operators engaged in "extreme and outrageous conduct."
The Michigan Supreme Court, after hearing oral argument, declined to take the case on appeal and let the Court of Appeals ruling stand.
Instructors for the Learning Center program include Michigan Court of Appeals Judge Amy Ronayne Krause, Supreme Court and State Court Administrative Office staff, and other legal professionals. Sessions take place from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in the Michigan Hall of Justice, located at 925 West Ottawa Street in Lansing. For additional information, contact Rachael L. Drenovsky at 517-373-5027 or visit http://www.courts.michigan.gov/plc/.
Published: Mon, Jun 25, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- ABA Legal Ed council repeals DEI standard
- Is Perry Mason TV’s most effective lawyer? New study names top 5
- Lawyer who cited paraphrasing as direct quotes in 2nd Circuit brief says AI played a role
- After jury deadlock and mistrial, Lindsay Clancy could face second trial
- Murder, Corruption and RICO in Georgia: Fateful meeting I didn’t want to attend led to courtroom win
- Bad Bunny, Justin Bieber among musical stars facing copyright suit for using reggaeton’s signature beat




