- Posted November 05, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Local company wins round in federal health law dispute
By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) -- A Detroit-area company challenging the federal health care law's mandated contraception coverage won an early round in its lawsuit against the Obama administration.
U.S. District Judge Robert Cleland issued a preliminary injunction last Wednesday barring the government from taking any action against Weingartz Supply Co., which has 170 employees and sells outdoor power equipment.
Weingartz said the contraception mandate violates the religion and free speech rights of its owners, who are Roman Catholics. But the health care law requires health plans to cover birth control for women, and employers can be fined by 2014 if they try to get around the mandate by not offering insurance.
Cleland said the government could eventually win the lawsuit. But he believes an injunction is appropriate in a case that will last months.
"Violation of a First Amendment right in itself constitutes irreparable harm," even for a brief period, the judge said.
Cleland said the government must show in the months ahead that the law carries a "compelling interest" for the public. Government lawyers so far have argued that the contraception mandate benefits women and their role in society.
"Because Weingartz Supply Co. is a for-profit, secular employer, many of its employees undoubtedly do not share Mr. Weingartz's religious beliefs," the U.S. Justice Department said in a court filing, referring to company president Dan Weingartz. "Those employees should not be denied the benefits of receiving a health plan through their employer that covers contraceptive services."
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette said the injunction is an important step in possibly defeating the contraception mandate.
"The First Amendment applies to everyone, and we must defend religious liberty for all, not just the chosen few dictated by the federal government," he said.
Published: Mon, Nov 5, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




