- Posted February 11, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court spikes suit over road dust, fatal crash
COPEMISH, Mich. (AP) -- The family of a teenager who was killed while driving to perform at a high school graduation can't sue a northern Michigan road agency over dust blamed for the fatal crash, the state Supreme Court said last Thursday.
The justices, 6-0, overturned a decision by the Michigan appeals court and directed a judge to dismiss the case against the Manistee County Road Commission.
In 2010, Debra Hagerty-Kraemer, 17, was driving to a Mesick High School graduation to perform with the band when she was killed. Her family says she smashed her car into a tree after she was blinded by road dust stirred up by a passing vehicle near Copemish.
The lawsuit alleged that the road commission was negligent in how it maintained Litzen Road.
A series of Supreme Court decisions, however, has made it difficult to sue government agencies over road conditions. In this case, the court again said the road commission is immune.
The justices said a "dust cloud rising from an unpaved road is not a defect" that would trigger the county's liability.
In addition, "an accumulation of gravel, whether natural or otherwise, does not implicate the defendant's duty to maintain the highway in reasonable repair," the court said, referring to a key threshold under Michigan law.
The decision was delivered in a one-page order, not a formal opinion. Nonetheless, it ends the lawsuit.
L. Page Graves, an attorney for Hagerty-Kraemer's family, said he's disappointed the court threw out the case without hearing arguments. He believes the justices wrongly applied legal precedent.
"My client never had a second in open court to debate these legal issues," said Graves, who wants the court to reconsider.
Published: Mon, Feb 11, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




