- Posted March 28, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lawsuit claims bank executives violated civil rights
PONTIAC (AP) -- Executives with a bank formed in part to serve people in southeastern Michigan with roots in India berated two customers and exchanged email calling Indians derogatory names, according to a lawsuit.
The lawsuit was filed March 12 in Oakland County Circuit Court against executives of Lotus Bank, the Detroit Free Press reported. The suit argues that the bank violated the civil rights of Jasit Takhar and Anil Gupta by creating a hostile business environment.
Krishna Malempati, chairman of the bank's board of directors and bank spokesman on the issue, said the bank denies any discrimination. Malempati said the board disciplined executives involved after being made aware of the emails. The executives still are employed by the bank.
"They're working very hard, and they've been coached and trained to work with the community," Malempati said.
The lawsuit stems from a dispute over a $1.4 million mortgage that Takhar and Gupta obtained from Lotus in 2008 to buy a Travelodge hotel in Jackson.
According to the lawsuit, the men told the bank in the spring of 2010 that business was down, and they likely would have trouble making timely payments. After initially being told they could be up to 90 days behind, they say they were threatened with foreclosure.
"It is absolutely shocking to me that the people at the top would show such disdain for the people they serve," said attorney Elizabeth Thomson, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Takhar and Gupta.
According to Malempati, the emails were unrelated to the mortgage.
Novi-based Lotus, which has a branch in the Detroit suburb of Farmington Hills, was incorporated in 2007 in part to serve the area's growing Indian community. Fourteen of its 17 board members are of Indian descent, as are about 30 percent of its customers.
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages, as well as measures such as training. It was filed shortly before the bank's board sent a letter to customers about the issue.
Published: Thu, Mar 28, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




