- Posted June 27, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State Supreme Court says no rights broken in talk with parole agent
JACKSON, Mich. (AP) -- A Jackson robbery suspect's confession to a parole officer can be used against him, even if he wasn't told he could remain silent.
The Michigan Supreme Court overturned a decision by the state appeals court and reinstated the conviction of Samuel Elliott. The decision was 5-2 Tuesday.
Elliott was in jail on a parole violation in 2010 when parole officer Cheryl Evans asked him about a gas station robbery. She didn't inform him of his Miranda right, but she also had no role in the robbery investigation.
The Supreme Court says the parole officer wasn't conducting a custodial interrogation of Elliott. But in a dissent, Justice Bridget McCormack notes that Elliott already had declined to talk to Jackson police without a lawyer.
Published: Thu, Jun 27, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Students honored by court at ceremony
- Supreme Court rules locals cannot be held civilly liable for MISS DIG Act violations
- ABA to honor five attorneys with Jefferson B. Fordham Society advocacy and achievement awards
- Nessel secures final victory as court dismisses appeal in case over federal offshore wind permitting pause
- Emergency relief funds available to help with water and sewer bills
headlines National
- 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
- Federal judge who had in-chambers sex with top police officer issues clerks revised apology letters
- Criminal defense lawyer arrested, faces multiple charges after viral video of road rage confrontation
- Immigration lawyers continue to fight scammers
- Supreme Court spares Alabama man from nitrogen gas execution
- Lawyer convicted of orchestrating drug deals wins back law license




