- Posted September 03, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Family awarded $32M in lawsuit against Domino's
By Juan A. Lozano
Associated Press
HOUSTON (AP) -- The family of a Southeast Texas couple involved in a deadly crash caused by a Domino's Pizza delivery driver was awarded $32 million this week after a jury determined the pizza chain shared responsibility for the accident by not enforcing a policy that its drivers' vehicles be inspected.
The August 2012 crash in Beaumont, about 90 miles northeast of Houston, happened after the driver lost control of his car while delivering a pizza, hitting another vehicle carrying 65-year-old Ruth Christopher and her husband, Devavaram Christopher.
Ruth Christopher died the next day while her husband, now 70, suffered a permanent traumatic brain injury that has left him unable to communicate.
The accident was attributed to defective, worn tires on the delivery vehicle. One tire had no tread. The driver, Joshua Balka, was also cited for speeding.
The jury, in its verdict last week, determined Domino's was 60 percent responsible for the accident for not enforcing the vehicle inspection policy with its franchises.
"We also learned that Domino's enforces a tragically unsafe delivery method by providing bonuses and other incentives for fast delivery," said Chip Ferguson, an attorney for the couple's family.
Tim McIntyre, vice president of communications for Ann Arbor-based Domino's, said the company offered its condolences for a "terrible accident."
But in an email, McIntyre said the company found it difficult to comprehend "that a corporation is responsible for whether an independent franchise employee is driving on bald tires."
"The employee in question did not work for us; he worked for an established independent franchise operation. Franchisors do not control the day-to-day operations of franchisees, especially to that minute level of detail. We are saddened by this tragedy, but do intend to appeal the decision," McIntyre wrote.
Published: Tue, Sep 3, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Reading reenactment
- Supreme Court overturns precedent on how to determine a child's domicile when parents are divorced
- Nessel reissues government imposter scams consumer alert following reports
- Formal Opinion 524: Government lawyers’ obligations when knowing of a public official’s intended or ongoing violation of law
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to address the opioid crisis, support public health
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




