- Posted October 21, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Federal court says Bernanke doesn't have to testify now
By Marcy Gordon
AP Business Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A U.S. court has ruled that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke needn't answer questions in a lawsuit filed by the former head of American International Group Inc. until he leaves office in January.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit also ordered last Wednesday that ex-CEO Hank Greenberg's company would have to make a strong case that it needs to question Bernanke in order to do so after the Fed chairman's term ends. The company, Starr International, hasn't shown the "extraordinary circumstances" to justify it, a three-judge panel said.
The action reversed a July ruling in Greenberg's favor by a judge in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. It is rare for a Fed chairman to be deposed in a lawsuit while in office.
Greenberg sued the government over the $182 billion bailout of AIG during the financial crisis, saying the terms were too onerous. He is seeking at least $25 billion in damages. Starr International was the largest AIG shareholder.
AIG has since repaid the bailout.
Greenberg's lead attorney, David Boies, said his team will seek to question Bernanke after he leaves office. "We are confident that we can make the showing of the importance of this testimony that the court requires," Boies said in a statement.
Bernanke's public statements and testimony in the case from other government officials demonstrate that Bernanke's deposition is needed because he was a key decision maker in the AIG bailout, Boies said.
Published: Mon, Oct 21, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- New ABA/Krill Strategies lawyer mental health study shows escalating burnout, risky alcohol use
- Nessel challenges administration’s rollbacks of Endangered Species Act regulations
- Time to renew license for 2026-2027 bar year
- Judge sentences man to 22 to 37 years for murder, felony firearm
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




