- Posted November 20, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Judge OKs deal on halal meals in prisons
By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) -- Muslims in Michigan prisons will be guaranteed meals that meet strict Islamic rules under a settlement a federal judge approved Monday.
The agreement ends years of litigation over the preparation of meals that are considered halal, or legal, under the Islamic faith. Earlier in the case, U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn also ordered the state to ensure that Muslim prisoners can celebrate important festivals and attend services that could conflict with work or education classes.
"Inmates do not lose their religious freedom rights simply because they're behind bars. The case was a tremendous success," said Michael Steinberg of the Michigan branch of the American Civil Liberties Union.
The ACLU handled the case along with attorney Daniel Quick.
A halal meal is prepared under Islamic rules governing the slaughter of animals. Pork is prohibited. Inmates sued in 2006, saying the Corrections Department violated their right to practice their religion.
Cohn approved the settlement, calling it "fair and reasonable," despite objections from some prisoners who say they prefer meat. The state has decided to serve a vegetarian meal for all inmates who request a meal that adheres to their religion, no matter their faith.
"Most of the soy being served at my facility is disgusting," wrote Bilal Chaaban, 31, who is serving a life sentence at a prison in the Upper Peninsula.
But the deal to end the lawsuit only covers preparation of the food, not what's in it. Anyone seeking to challenge what's served will have to take it up with the prison or file a lawsuit, Quick said.
A private company, Aramark, is taking over prison food operations in December. Michigan had more than 1,800 Muslim inmates in 2010, less than 10 percent of the prison population, according to a court filing.
Published: Wed, Nov 20, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




