- Posted March 28, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Debt collector prevails in lawsuit tied to two words
DETROIT (AP) -- Is there a difference between the words "of" and "after?" A federal court says no, at least not in a dispute between a Detroit man and a debt collector.
Carl Wallace sued Diversified Consultants. He accused the company of violating a federal law because of the wording of a debt notice related to a $2,000 phone bill.
Wallace was asked to respond within 30 days "of" receiving a notice. But the law covering debt collections says people have 30 days to respond "after" getting a notice.
So what? Indeed, that's what an appeals court said Wednesday in affirming the dismissal of a class-action lawsuit in Detroit federal court. The court doubts that anyone who got the letter was confused.
Attorney Brian Parker of Bingham Farms was seeking thousands of dollars.
Published: Fri, Mar 28, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Judge’s memorial unveiled
- Bring ’em to Ingham? Not necessarily, Supreme Court rules of lawsuits state files
- Nessel secures preliminary injunction protecting USDA funding
- Final judgment secured in lawsuit challenging administration’s $100k tax for H-1B visas
- Woman sentenced for distributing child porn, prosecutor disappointed with sentence imposed
headlines National
- Bill Kurtis’ memoir tells how law school trained him for covering trials
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Justice Barrett’s home targeted in attempted swatting call
- Texting-and-driving charges dropped against woman without right hand
- Fender warns guitar makers to stop producing Stratocaster look-a-likes
- General counsel compensation climbs, aligned with equity and company scale
