- Posted June 20, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
COMMENTARY: The California hitman law
By Marie E. Matyjaszek
I was watching television the other night, trying to pretend I could still stay up late and function the next day when I came across a show called "Who the bleep did I marry." In this episode, California police detective John Pomroy was detailing how his ex-wife Tina received half of their marital estate even though she tried to hire a hitman to kill him.
Tina was physically abusive and suffered from addictions to prescription medications, alcohol, and illegal drugs, so it was no surprise that John was awarded custody of the couple's children in their 2002 divorce action. Most individuals would be very upset in this situation, but Tina took it a step further.
Conveniently, some members of a biker gang lived nearby and she tried to hire them to kill her husband. Unfortunately for Tina, she solicited members with scruples, as they quickly ratted her out to the police. Undercover officers then caught Tina in the act and she was eventually convicted of solicitation for murder.
Due to California law at the time, a spouse was only barred from receiving assets if she personally attempted the murder, not if she hired someone. As one would imagine, John was quite irritated by this legal loophole, so he made it his mission to get the law changed.
John's goal became reality California Family Code Section 4324 states "when a spouse is convicted of attempting to murder the other spouseâ?¦or of soliciting the murder of the other spouseâ?¦the injured spouse shall be entitled to a prohibition of any temporary or permanent award for spousal support or medical, life, or other insurance benefits or payments from the injured spouse to the other spouse." The injured spouse need not actually be physically injured for this to apply.
It seems ridiculous that this law had not always been in effect or that the judge in the Pomroy case wouldn't have been a trailblazer and set new precedent, but just watching the news will tell you there's a lot of ridiculousness out there. In fact, I think that's even a television show.
--------
Marie E. Matyjaszek author is a family law attorney whose blog site is: http://legalbling.blogspot.com. She can be reached by e-mailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com.
Published: Fri, Jun 20, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- New ABA/Krill Strategies lawyer mental health study shows escalating burnout, risky alcohol use
- Nessel challenges administration’s rollbacks of Endangered Species Act regulations
- Time to renew license for 2026-2027 bar year
- Judge sentences man to 22 to 37 years for murder, felony firearm
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




