- Posted July 11, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court to take up pregnancy case
WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. Supreme Court will take up the pregnancy discrimination claims of a package delivery driver for UPS in Maryland who was refused a light duty assignment so she could continue working while pregnant.
Peggy Young lost her health benefits when UPS would not grant her light duty or allow her to continue her regular job. Young says the company allows employees with some medical conditions to perform jobs in which they can avoid lifting heavy packages.
Young, who joined UPS in 1999 and worked out of a UPS facility in Landover, initially filed her lawsuit in federal court in Maryland. She said that in 2006 her doctor wrote UPS a note letting the company know Young was pregnant and recommending she not lift more than 20 pounds early in her pregnancy and 10 pounds later in her pregnancy. Young says she offered to do her regular job since it rarely involved heavy lifting, but the company told her no and that there was no light duty available for pregnant employees.
Young went on an extended leave of absence without pay and ultimately lost her medical coverage. She returned to work at UPS after giving birth in 2007.
Lower courts ruled that UPS did not violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in dealing with Young. The Obama administration agreed with Young, but said recent changes in federal law could cause courts to rule in another way.
The case will be argued later this year.
Published: Fri, Jul 11, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




