- Posted July 11, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court to hear Amtrak dispute this year
By Sam Hananel
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court recently said it will consider whether Amtrak can partner with a government agency to create rules that other private railroads must follow.
The justices agreed to hear the Obama administration's appeal of a lower court ruling that said Congress unconstitutionally gave regulatory power to the passenger railroad company.
Congress passed a law in 2008 that directed Amtrak to work with the Federal Railroad Administration to develop standards for improving passenger rail service. The new standards were meant to help Amtrak improve its on-time performance and quality of service.
But the American Association of Railroads sued, arguing that a private company was not allowed to develop regulations. The association, which represents freight railroads, was not pleased with the proposed standards that Amtrak and the government had worked out. They included new standards on how Amtrak would keep its priority over freight trains in using common railroad tracks.
A federal court rejected the freight railroads' arguments, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit disagreed. It ruled that even though Amtrak is subject to government oversight, it remains a for-profit company that cannot be given regulatory authority.
The Transportation Department says it has been nearly 80 years since a court has struck down a law on the grounds that it impermissibly gave regulatory power to a private party. The Obama administration argues that Amtrak's role in developing regulations was limited and that the government retained enough control over the ultimate standards.
The freight railroads say that the Amtrak "can wield its lawmaking authority to its commercial advantage." They argue that allowing Amtrak to help craft the rules would let the passenger railroad pressure freight railroads to rewrite private contracts that govern how common tracks are shared.
The court will hear the case, Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads, 13-1080, when its new term begins in the fall.
Published: Fri, Jul 11, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




