- Posted September 15, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Judge says city isn't on hook for property values
TRAVERSE CITY (AP) - A judge has ruled that Traverse City isn't responsible for declines in property values that could be linked to officials' decision to remove a northern Michigan dam.
The Traverse City Record-Eagle reports Circuit Court Judge Philip Rodgers last Thursday effectively dismissed parts of a lawsuit filed by several Boardman River property owners after an October 2012 breach of the Brown Bridge Dam.
The property owners argued Traverse City should be liable for damaging floods and erosion after the dam's removal. Rodgers disagreed.
Attorney Kristyn Houle, who represents several property owners in the lawsuit, says she "respectfully and strongly disagreed" with Rodgers' decision. She says even without the breach, property owners still suffered from the decision to remove the dam.
The city-owned dam was built for hydropower generation in 1921.
Published: Mon, Sep 15, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Counsel Connect
- Nessel files reply calling for full public hearings on DTE’s data center application
- Webinar looks at program provding protein to families involved with courts
- Michigan veterans warned of postcard scam targeting personal information
- Man sentenced for arson, ?first-degree animal torture/killing
headlines National
- The business of successfully running an in-house department
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Justice Gorsuch writes children’s book about ‘Heroes of 1776’
- Companies use ‘deceitful tactics’ to market harmful ultra-processed products with ‘addictive nature,’ city’s suit alleges
- Lawyer accused of trying to poison her husband
- ‘Lawyers Gone Wild’? Filmmaker criticizes bar as he seeks ethics probe of serial killer’s daughter for alleged lie
