- Posted November 14, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
COMMENTARY: Daddy drama unfolds in case
By Marie E. Matyjaszek
I was having a conversation with my mom the other day and she brought up an interesting question if a woman slept with identical twins and became pregnant, could anyone tell who is the real father?
My first thought was, "Wow, that's a really weird question coming from my mom," while my second thought was "I wonder if there are any cases on the topic?"
Because Google is the best search engine ever, I found a great result as soon as I plugged in the question.
With the facts reading straight out of a "Maury Povich" episode, two identical twin brothers from Missouri, Raymon and Richard Miller, both had sex with Holly Adams on the same day. Allegedly, the timing of these encounters was pretty darn close too (did brother No. 2 enter through the front door while brother No. 1 left out of the back?). It's hard to believe things like this really happen, but I'm betting there was not a high moral standard with this group.
So, nine months later, Holly gives birth to a baby girl. She writes Raymon down as the father, but he contests it. In a particularly salacious move, he drags his brother Richard into court as his defense.
Now, as you may know, identical twins have the same DNA. One sperm fertilizes one egg that subsequently divides in two. When the paternity test result was in, it showed that both brothers had a 99.9 percent chance of being the child's father.
The tricky issue (well, legally; I'm sure family get-togethers were a lot more awkward) was which brother would be held responsible for the little girl. Who had to fork over the child support that was owed? Judge Fred Copeland was certainly in a dilemma. There was absolutely no way scientifically for him to conclude who was the real father. So, he relied on Holly's testimony and went with whom she had originally named Raymon.
Not surprisingly, Raymon was quite irritated and planned on appealing until he was vindicated. Both brothers were quoted as saying the other just doesn't want the financial burden or responsibility of a child. Too bad the kid can't just pick my guess is she'd vote for anyone other than these two.
--------
Marie E. Matyjaszek is a family law attorney whose blog site is: http://legalbling.blogspot.com. She can be reached by e-mailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com.
Published: Fri, Nov 14, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- ABA amicus brief supports noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing when detention becomes ‘unreasonably prolonged’
- Nessel secures full victory in lawsuit challenging administration’s attack on fair housing protections
- Whitmer announces new automotive jobs, investment in Oakland County
- AG pushes federal government to strengthen rules to combat illegal robocalls
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




