- Posted November 06, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Constitution Day was a success
On September 17, I had the privilege of teaching at the Slauson Junior High sixth grade in Ann Arbor, for Constitution Day. Our curriculum was on the right to jury trial, and how juries are selected. The class selected a jury using both preemptory and for cause strikes of jurors described in our class materials.
The following week, I received letters from Mrs. McGinn's sixth-grade class with reactions and comments. They include: "The thing I love most was when we got to argue against the other side to keep the accused out of jail"; "The authentic role play of a trial at court led me to decide I definitely want to be a lawyer;" "I learned the jury decides and not the judge;" "I learned that solving a problem is very hard and it will be very stressful for the jury to solve problems;" and, "I learned you can't just pick anybody to be a juror you have to find out if they were involved in a crime or if they might have an opinion and can't be part of the jury."
I am sure my experience was similar to other lawyers who filled 152 class slots this year in talking to students in 6th through 11th grade. I recommend it to anyone next year.
Sincerely,
Andrew S. Muth, Muth Law, Ypsilanti
Published: Thu, Nov 06, 2014
headlines Washtenaw County
- MSU Law celebrates 25 years of the Geoffrey Fieger Trial Practice Institute
- Marching on: Expert in liquor law overcomes more than her share of hurdles
- The time has come to put an end to electoral vote in U.S.
- Business helps clients take empowering step forward
- Stride for Justice charity event slated for April 18
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




