- Posted January 08, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Michigan Supreme Court to hear oral arguments Jan. 13
Whether governmental employees are required to join a union or pay union dues; whether employees in the state defined pension system are required to contribute 4 percent to that plan or switch to a defined contribution plan are questions before the Michigan Supreme Court in oral arguments next week.
The question in the first case on Jan. 13, frequently called the "right to work" law, is whether public employers can require governmental employees to join a union or pay union dues or fees as a condition of obtaining or continuing public employment.
The question in the second case is whether employees in the state defined benefit pension plan must contribute 4 percent of their income to that plan or switch to the defined 401(k) contribution plan.
Additional cases scheduled for Jan. 13 and 15 include questions about suppression of statements to police; plea discussions; right to a speedy trial; presentation of perjured testimony during trial; growing, possessing, and selling marijuana; sentencing guidelines; and jury awards in a complex contract action.
The Court will hear the oral argument in its courtroom on the sixth floor of the Michigan Hall of Justice on Jan. 13 and 15, starting at 9:30 a.m. each day. The Court's oral arguments are open to the public.
The Michigan Supreme Court broadcasts its oral arguments and other hearings live on the Internet via streaming video technology. Watch the stream live only while the Court is in session and on the bench. Streaming will begin shortly before the hearing starts; audio will be muted until the Court takes the bench.
Published: Thu, Jan 08, 2015
headlines Ingham County
- MAJ president takes leadership role to heart
- Cooley Law School Innocence Project hosts wrongful conviction panel featuring several exonerees
- United States Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon, Jr. Honors Six First Responders for Their Exceptional Acts of Bravery
- Senior paralegal has seen both sides of the law
- Specificity is key when submitting hearing objections
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says




