- Posted March 19, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Statewide survey says public is satisfied with Michigan's trial courts
A survey released March 16 by the Michigan Supreme Court revealed that court users are very satisfied with their experiences in Michigan's trial courts. On questions ranging from fairness to timeliness, 26,000 people statewide were surveyed late last year as part of the Court's efforts to measure trial court performance and improve service to the public.
What's the verdict?
- 82 percent of court users felt the way the judge, magistrate or referee handled their case was fair.
- 86 percent of court users were able to get their business done in a reasonable amount of time.
- 93 percent of court users felt they were treated with courtesy and respect by court staff.
"Michigan is a national leader in measuring court performance, and the public is very satisfied," said Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr. "The public satisfaction survey and other measures are critically important management tools that help judges statewide make informed decisions and be the best possible stewards of tax dollars."
Young also noted that Michigan's judiciary has stepped up to meet the challenge of shrinking state budgets. For example, more than 40 judgeships are being eliminated, a move that will ultimately save taxpayers more than $175 million. In addition, three out of four courts statewide have plans to share resources, balance workloads, and increase collaboration.
"Consistently high public satisfaction rankings tell us that streamlining and re-engineering of court processes to increase efficiency can be accomplished while maintaining a superior level of customer service," Chief Justice Young added.
The survey questions are modeled after the National Center for State Courts' survey template. The survey was made available to everyone leaving the courthouse during a five-day period, and courts were instructed to obtain a representative sample of persons served by the court. Completed surveys were mailed to SCAO where they were scanned, verified, and analyzed.
The Michigan Supreme Court is driving change by measuring performance to improve outcomes; implementing technology to work smarter; and re-engineering court processes to increase efficiency.
Published: Thu, Mar 19, 2015
headlines Ingham County
- ABA House of Delegates adopts nearly 30 policies on wide-ranging legal issues
- Champion swimmer dives into law school studies
- Three takeaways from Michigan Law faculty panel on local and national immigration enforcement
- The reality regarding the auto no-fault insurance reform laws, according to CPAN and law firm
- Neutrality, truthfulness, and trust: What ABA Formal Opinion 518 teaches mediators about their role—and their words
headlines National
- Millions of Americans continue to lack meaningful access to justice. What can be done about it?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Federal judge hands down $110K penalty against 2 lawyers for AI errors in court documents
- Former adult film actress passes February bar exam in Texas
- Grad sues George Washington University, Ernst & Young after Gaza ‘genocide’ remarks in commencement speech
- Magicians Penn & Teller file Supreme Court brief questioning use of ‘investigative hypnosis’




