DETROIT (AP) — General Motors CEO Mary Barra will be questioned this fall by lawyers suing GM over its defective ignition switches.
Barra is one of 35 current and former GM employees who will be questioned, attorney Bob Hilliard said last Thursday. The depositions begin May 6 with the questioning of GM customer experience chief Alicia Boler-Davis. Barra’s deposition, scheduled for Oct. 8, would be the last.
Hilliard sued GM last July on behalf of people who were injured or killed in crashes allegedly caused by faulty ignition switches. A trial is scheduled for January 2016 in U.S. District Court in New York.
The switches could slip into the “off” position, disabling power steering and air bags. The lawsuit alleges GM knew about the defective switches as early as 2001 but didn’t recall any cars until last year.
Barra told Congress she learned about the defective switches in December 2013, a month before GM began recalling 2.6 million affected vehicles.
GM has already admitted violating the law, paying a $35 million fine and agreeing to strict federal oversight.
It has also paid undisclosed settlements to the families of 67 people killed in crashes caused by the switches as part of a compensation fund overseen by Kenneth Feinberg. The fund has also compensated 113 people injured in crashes.
The plaintiffs represented by Hilliard are not part of that settlement process.
GM and its employees could also face separate criminal charges as a result of an ongoing Justice Department investigation.
- Posted March 23, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
GM CEO to be questioned in ignition-switches lawsuit
headlines Oakland County
- Historical: Circuit Court judge has made indelible mark
- New ABA/Krill Strategies lawyer mental health study shows escalating burnout, risky alcohol use
- Nessel challenges administration’s rollbacks of Endangered Species Act regulations
- Time to renew license for 2026-2027 bar year
- Judge sentences man to 22 to 37 years for murder, felony firearm
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




