- Posted December 31, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
New Hampshire high court rejects most challenges to auto dealer protection law
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) - New Hampshire's Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected most challenges to the state's Auto Dealers Bill of Rights law, which was expanded to include manufacturers of tractors and yard and garden equipment.
John Deere and other farm and heavy equipment managers said the law looping them into protections designed for automobile and truck dealers unconstitutionally interferes with their equipment dealer contracts. They said they were improperly lumped in with auto manufacturers.
The state argued the law is a merger of regulations that dealt separately with automobile manufacturers and farm and tractor manufacturers. It bars manufacturers from terminating contracts with dealers without just cause, limits mandatory upgrades to facilities and requires proper reimbursement for warranty work done by dealers.
The state rejected most of the equipment manufacturers' arguments that the law violates state and federal contract clauses, or that it is discriminatory. It sent back one challenge raised by Husqvarna to a lower court judge. That questioned whether the state passed legislation that improperly burdens or discriminates against interstate commerce.
When she signed the bill into law in 2013, Gov. Maggie Hassan said it leveled the playing field between manufacturers and dealers. A judge barred it from taking effect after Deere and others filed suit.
"On behalf of the tens of thousands of people who work for franchised automotive dealerships around New Hampshire, I sincerely hope this is the final legal fight over this important law," said Peter McNamara, president of the New Hampshire Automobile Dealers Association. "In one fashion or another, these laws are on the books in virtually every other state in the country, and this is an unwarranted interruption of basic rights for those who work in New Hampshire's auto, truck and farm equipment sales business every day."
A call to a spokesman for John Deere seeking comment was not immediately returned Tuesday afternoon.
Published: Thu, Dec 31, 2015
headlines Oakland County
- District court discourse
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




