ST. LOUIS (AP) — For the second time in three months, a St. Louis jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay a huge award over claims that its talcum powder causes cancer.
The jury deliberated eight hours Monday before ordering the company to pay $55 million to a South Dakota woman who blamed her ovarian cancer on years of talcum powder use.
In February, another St. Louis jury awarded $72 million to the family of an Alabama woman who died from ovarian cancer, which she said was caused by using Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder and other talcum products.
New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson will appeal the latest ruling.
Talc is naturally occurring, mined from the soil and composed of magnesium, silicon, oxygen, and hydrogen.
It’s widely used in cosmetics and personal care products, such as talcum powder, to absorb moisture, prevent caking and improve the product’s feel.
Johnson & Johnson previously has been targeted by health and consumer groups over possibly harmful ingredients in items including its iconic Johnson’s No More Tears baby shampoo.
- Posted May 04, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Jury awards $55M in Johnson & Johnson suit
headlines Macomb
- Scholarship recipients celebrated
- Crony capitalism topic of podcast’s latest episode
- Department of War’s strategic priorities focus of ABA national security luncheon
- Entrepreneurship Score Card shows Michigan’s small business economy remains stable, amid slower growth
- Out-of-state residents arraigned after allegedly spray-painting offensive graffiti at four locations in Sterling Heights
headlines National
- Millions of Americans continue to lack meaningful access to justice. What can be done about it?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Federal judge hands down $110K penalty against 2 lawyers for AI errors in court documents
- Former adult film actress passes February bar exam in Texas
- Grad sues George Washington University, Ernst & Young after Gaza ‘genocide’ remarks in commencement speech
- Magicians Penn & Teller file Supreme Court brief questioning use of ‘investigative hypnosis’




