BRIGHTON (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court says reserve officers are no different than full-time police officers under a state law that penalizes people who resist.
In a recent unanimous decision, the court acknowledged that reserve officer isn’t specifically mentioned in the law. But the justices say the Legislature intended “an expansive and inclusive reading” of police officer.
In lower courts, Ryan Feeley had successfully argued that Brighton reserve Officer Doug Roberts didn’t fit the meaning of the law.
Feeley was accused of running from Roberts after a disturbance at a bar.
The case now returns to the Michigan appeals court to determine if Roberts’ command to stop was lawful.
- Posted July 04, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State high court rules resisting reserve officers can be a crime
headlines Macomb
- Macomb County judge honored
- Mount Clemens woman pleads no contest to charge stemming from threats sent to Mount Clemens mayor
- MDHHS seeks applications for Rural Health Transformation Program Workforce for Wellness Initiative
- Prosecutor warns of fake jail bond scam targeting families
- Governor welcomes new unemployment protections for survivors of domestic violence
headlines National
- Chemerinsky: Supreme Court leaves many Second Amendment issues unresolved
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- After emergencies mar bar exam, New York State Bar Association aims to add new procedures
- When you get blasted by your own canon
- Ex-lawyer seeks bar reinstatement after US House primary win
- Trump selects newly confirmed federal judge for open seat on 5th Circuit




