WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will consider whether the city of Miami can sue major banks over allegations they engaged in a decade-long pattern of discriminatory lending practices that harmed the city.
The justices recently said they will hear appeals from Wells Fargo and Bank of America arguing that the city is not authorized to sue under the Fair Housing Act.
A federal judge dismissed the lawsuits, but a federal appeals court said they could go forward. Miami claims the banks targeted African-American and Hispanic borrowers for predatory loans that carried more risk, higher
costs and steeper fines than loans offered to white customers.
The city claims the loans resulted in a higher number of foreclosures, reducing tax collections and damaging neighborhoods.
The court will hear the cases this fall.
- Posted July 19, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court to hear Miami loan discrimination case
headlines Macomb
- A ‘vibrant and collaborative space’
- Michigan Consumer Protection launches ‘Abbott Elementary’ inspired consumer protection campaign
- Three plead guilty to identity theft, fraud, forgery scheme attempting over half-million dollar theft
- Free billing software available for Michigan attorneys
- ‘Accounting 101 for Attorneys’ presented online
headlines National
- This LA lawyer levels up legal protections in the video game industry
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- An eccentric path to a satisfying retirement
- What lawyers can learn about storytelling from Josh Johnson’s comedy
- Davis Polk will pay $25K stipend to 2027 summer associates ‘giving back’ in summer 2026
- After defense lawyer dies during trial, judge convicted for using public funds for vacations, personal purchases




