DETROIT (AP) — A special panel at the Michigan Court of Appeals says judges — not juries — must decide whether someone under 18 gets life in prison without parole.
It’s a major decision that settles conflicting opinions by other panels at the appeals court. An appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court is likely.
Lawyers representing teens convicted of murder had argued that juries needed to make a specific determination that someone had no hope of being rehabilitated and deserved a no-parole sentence.
They pointed to a line of U.S. Supreme Court cases, especially a 2012 decision that said teens must be treated differently than adults.
But in an opinion released last Friday, the appellate panel said the duty rests with trial judges.
- Posted July 27, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Appeals court: No parole for teens rests with judges, not juries
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why federal judge fined Alston & Bird $10K for conducting jury research on LinkedIn
- Florida cases seeking death penalty for child sex abuse could test precedent in Supreme Court
- Kutak Rock hits 600-attorney mark with Ohio expansion
- Law firm deals with government have ethical implications, DC Bar ethics opinion says
- Responding to merger talks claim, Cadwalader says ‘we regularly evaluate our strategy,’ but finances are strong
