WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a lower court’s ruling that said significant changes to Michigan’s sex offender registry law could not be applied retroactively.
Michigan asked the high court to take up the issue after a 2016 federal appeals court ruling, but the Supreme Court declined in an order Monday.
The appeals court said that retroactively applying the changes to people already on the list would unconstitutionally increase punishments after offenders’ convictions.
Michigan said it changed its law in response to a federal law that sets minimum standards for registries. States that fail to follow those minimum standards can lose federal law-enforcement funds.
Michigan argued that the case was important to all states trying to comply with federal law.
- Posted October 03, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court declines Michigan sex offender registry case
headlines Macomb
- Dual artistry: Lawyer’s creativity spans worlds of art and fintech and art
- Eastpointe man pleads no contest to second-degree murder
- Warren man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Law school advances to top 3% worldwide at international Jessup competition in Washington, D.C.
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




