Sarah L. Wixson, a corporate and real estate attorney with a background in civil litigation, has joined Varnum’s Litigation Practice Team. She will be based in the firm’s Ann Arbor office.
Wixson’s litigation work is primarily focused on business matters and commercial contract disputes. She has experience in a broad range of matters, including employment litigation, intellectual property and personal injury cases.
Wixson also serves as general counsel for business clients, works with physicians, and represents businesses and individuals in residential and commercial real estate matters.
Wixson graduated cum laude from Hope College, where she earned her undergraduate degree in Spanish and English, including studying abroad at the Universidad De Sevilla in Spain.
She is a graduate of Wayne State University Law School, where she was a Dean’s Scholar, Bronze Key Certificate Recipient, and Senior Note and Comment Editor for The Wayne Law Review.
After serving as a law clerk and associate attorney at a large litigation firm for several years, Wixson worked at a boutique litigation firm where she focused on complex business litigation and contract work. She joins Varnum from Wixson Law, PLLC.
- Posted March 12, 2018
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Wixson joins Varnum's Ann Arbor office
headlines Washtenaw County
- MSU Law celebrates 25 years of the Geoffrey Fieger Trial Practice Institute
- Marching on: Expert in liquor law overcomes more than her share of hurdles
- The time has come to put an end to electoral vote in U.S.
- Business helps clients take empowering step forward
- Stride for Justice charity event slated for April 18
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




