Brinks Gilson & Lione, one of the largest intellectual property law firms in the United States, has elected four attorneys as shareholders: Dr. Joshua E. Ney in Ann Arbor; Virginia Wolk Marino in Chicago; and Mark D. Jenkins and Amy H. Fix in Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Ney represents clients in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries in patent litigation and patent prosecution matters and counsels clients on due diligence and freedom-to-operate issues. His litigation experience includes matters in the U.S. district courts as well as inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. He represents pharmaceutical clients in matters involving new chemical entities, second medical uses, pharmaceutical formulations, synthetic processes and pharmaceutical polymorphs.
Named an Up and Coming Lawyer by Michigan Lawyers Weekly in December, Ney earned his J.D., cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School, his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan and a B.A., magna cum laude, from Dartmouth College.
- Posted January 17, 2019
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Ney elected as shareholder at Brinks Gilson & Lione
headlines Washtenaw County
- Michigan Law launches AI Advisory Council, convenes inaugural meeting
- State Bar President aims to strengthen services
- There is always an ‘alternative’ to service mandate
- State Bar of Michigan launches MiLawyer Podcast to help attorneys improve their practice and protect their well-being
- Four takeaways from the former President of the European Court of Human Rights
headlines National
- Play-Based Learning: Can simulation games help lawyers learn management and business development skills?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Court orders hospital to resume gender-affirming care for transgender kids
- Netflix’s ‘The Lincoln Lawyer’ will rest his case at end of season 5
- Woman gives birth during arraignment in NYC courtroom
- SCOTUS will examine scope of Title IX protections and whether civil rights law covers work bias claims




