The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility recently released guidance exploring ethical obligations for lawyers when they change firms.
Formal Opinion 489 acknowledges that a lawyer has the right to switch firms and notes that ethics rules do not allow non-competition clauses in partnership, member, shareholder or employment agreements.
When a lawyer gives notice, it’s suggested the lawyer and the firm develop a plan that is orderly, flexible and “protects client interests during the lawyer’s transition.”
The guidance also cites several model rules to consider under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct related to the orderly transition of client matters and restraints on a client’s choice of counsel.
“Firms may require some period of advance notice of an intended departure,” the opinion reads. “The period of time should be the minimum necessary, under the circumstances, for clients to make decisions about who will represent them, assemble files, adjust staffing at the firm if the firm is to continue as counsel on matters previously handled by the departing attorney, and secure firm property in the departing lawyer’s possession.
“Firm notification requirements, however, cannot be so rigid that they restrict or interfere with a client’s choice of counsel or the client’s choice of when to transition a matter.”
The ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility periodically issues ethics opinions to guide lawyers, courts and the public in interpreting and applying ABA model ethics rules to specific issues of legal practice, client-lawyer relationships and judicial behavior.
- Posted December 10, 2019
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Ethical guidance offered to lawyers, firms
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- More lawyers—and clients—want to learn about sustainable development practices
- Top artificial intelligence insurance tips for lawyers
- Lawyer charged with illegally transmitting Michigan data after 2020 election
- Viral video shows former Rikers Island inmate as she learns she passed bar exam on first try
- How Sullivan & Cromwell is scrutinizing potential new hires after campus protests
- No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes, SCOTUS rules