For the 17th consecutive year, Sinas Dramis Managing Partner, George T. Sinas, co-moderated and presented at Michigan’s premier auto no-fault legal symposium—the MAJ No-Fault Institute.
This annual event, sponsored by the Michigan Association for Justice (MAJ), is an intensive two-day seminar that focuses on the representation of injury victims and their medical providers regarding claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents. This year, the focus of the Institute was an in-depth analysis of Michigan’s new auto insurance laws enacted in 2019.
Sinas, who co-founded the event in 2004, shared moderator duties with Wayne J. Miller of Miller & Tischler, PC. A record crowd of over 300 persons attended this year’s Institute, conducted virtually over four one-half day sessions in late October.
Sinas also presented a legal analysis of recent court decisions impacting the rights of victims to pursue auto injury liability claims.
Stephen H. Sinas, Thomas G. Sinas, and Catherine E. Tucker from the Sinas Dramis Law Firm also gave presentations about various issues affecting the legal rights of injured patients and medical providers in motor vehicle injury cases.
- Posted November 26, 2020
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Sinas Dramis attorneys present at No-Fault Institute
headlines Ingham County
- NALP report: Changes are occurring in student recruiting
- MSU Law celebrates 25 years of the Geoffrey Fieger Trial Practice Institute
- Business helps clients take empowering step forward
- Stride for Justice charity event slated for April 18
- Marching on: Expert in liquor law overcomes more than her share of hurdles
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




