The Michigan Supreme Court recently announced the appointment of 29 individuals (visit courts.mi.gov/JudicialCouncil for biographies) to the newly-created Michigan Judicial Council (MJC). The court chose from nearly 200 diverse and talented applicants to serve on the MJC, which is charged with developing a strategic plan for the judicial branch of government. The applicants who were not chosen will be asked to support the work of the MJC through various committees.
“Michigan’s judiciary is at the center of the most dramatic and meaningful changes in how people interact with government to make our justice system more accessible, equitable, engaged, and efficient,” said Chief Justice Bridget M. McCormack. “We met the challenge of the pandemic and have responded with a forward-looking agenda to make Michigan a national leader. The Judicial Council will play a critical role in consulting the public, bringing together a wide range of viewpoints, and developing a path forward.”
Created by the addition of Michigan Court Rule 8.128, the MJC is expected to convene in July 2021, and embark on a strategic planning process that will include visioning, analyzing trends, reviewing outreach data, and developing strategic goals and long-term strategies for advancing judicial branch reform and improvements.
“Serious discussions are occurring every day regarding mental health, racial equity, access to justice, pretrial practices, the use of money bail, and equitable models for trial court funding,” McCormack added.
“These conversations are crucial, but strategic planning for Michigan’s judiciary is essential to coordinate these programs, set priorities, collect standardized data, and provide guidance across jurisdictions statewide.”
The MJC begins its work with many ongoing initiatives already underway, emphasizing the need for coordination and collaboration across the judiciary and among stakeholders:
• Justice for All Task Force: Committed to providing all Michigan residents access to our civil justice system.
• Diversity and Inclusion Committee: Assists SCAO with recruiting and hiring a diverse workforce and expanding diversity and inclusion training throughout the judiciary.
• Michigan Joint Task Force on Jail and Pretrial Incarceration: Collecting data, developing recommendations, and implementing reforms to safely reduce county jail populations via non-jail alternatives.
• MiFILE: Developing a statewide electronic filing system for filing and serving court documents online.
• MI-Resolve: Online dispute resolution tool available to users across Michigan to resolve certain disputes.
• Trial Court Funding Commission: Advancing recommendations to create a stable court funding system, uniform assessments, centralized collections, a uniform employment system, and providing for all the technology needs of the trial courts.
• Virtual Courtrooms: By purchasing Zoom licenses for every judge in Michigan early in 2019, SCAO was able to give trial courts the tools they needed to continue service during the COVID-19 pandemic. SCAO established a virtual courtroom directory on its website that enabled the public to observe court proceedings statewide. To date, Michigan judges have held nearly three million hours of virtual court hearings via Zoom and trial court YouTube videos have been viewed more than 35 million times.
• Problem-Solving Courts (PSCs): Michigan’s 199 drug and sobriety, mental health, and veterans treatment courts have an impressive record of reducing recidivism and making a positive difference in the lives of thousands of state residents and their families.
The following individuals are appointed to the Michigan Judicial Council established by MCR 8.128:
—For terms ending December 31, 2022:
Justice Elizabeth T. Clement (Michigan Supreme Court Justice)
Judge William A. Baillargeon (At-Large Judge)
Judge Aaron J. Gauthier (At-Large Judge)
James A. McGrail (Trial Court Administrator/Probate Court Registrar)
Judge Melissa L. Pope (Michigan Tribal State Federal Judicial Forum)
James W. Heath (Attorney)
Angela S. Tripp (Justice For All Commission Member)
Sheryl M. Kubiak (Member of the Public)
—For terms ending December 31, 2023:
Judge Martha D. Anderson (Michigan Judges Association)
Judge Susan L. Dobrich (Michigan Probate Judges Association)
Judge Michelle Friedman Appel (Michigan District Judges Association)
Judge Herman Marable, Jr. (Association of Black Judges of Michigan)
Judge Mary B. Barglind (At-Large Judge)
Zenell B. Brown (Trial Court Administrator/Probate Court Registrar)
Lindsay A. Oswald (County Clerk)
Marilena David-Martin (Attorney)
Tamara Brubaker-Salcedo (Member of the Public)
—For terms ending December 31, 2024:
Judge Jon A. Van Allsburg (Michigan Judges Association)
Judge John D. Tomlinson (Michigan Probate Judges Association)
Judge Demetria Brue (Michigan District Judges Association)
Judge Kameshia D. Gant (Association of Black Judges of Michigan)
Judge Helal A. Farhat (At-Large Judge)
Ines Straube (Trial Court Administrator/Probate Court Registrar)
Valerie J. Robbins (Trial Court Administrator/Probate Court Registrar)
Justin F. Roebuck (County Clerk)
Thomas W. Cranmer (Attorney)
- Posted July 15, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court takes next steps to develop strategic plan, appoints members of Michigan Judicial Council
headlines Washtenaw County
- Ask the expert: Who are hospital ethics consultants?
- Sinas Dramis celebrates successful Lids for Kids events in Lansing and Grand Rapids
- MSU Law leads nation in Rural Summer Legal Corps participation
- Assistant Public Defender heeds advice from late Justice Ginsburg
- Two national voices to headline Cooley Innocence Project’s 25th Anniversary Gala
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




